The question of whether you can require background checks for trustees is increasingly common, and the short answer is generally, yes, with careful consideration and proper implementation. While not legally mandated in most jurisdictions, prudent estate planning, particularly with substantial assets or vulnerable beneficiaries, strongly suggests that background checks are a valuable tool for protecting the integrity of a trust. Approximately 68% of estate planning attorneys report an increase in client inquiries regarding trustee vetting procedures in the last five years, indicating a growing awareness of potential risks. It’s not about distrust, but about due diligence; a trustee manages potentially significant assets and holds a fiduciary duty, making responsible selection paramount. This essay will explore the legality, benefits, process, and potential pitfalls of requiring background checks for trustees, focusing on the perspective of Steve Bliss, an Estate Planning Attorney in San Diego.
Should I be worried about trustee dishonesty?
The concern about trustee dishonesty is not unfounded. Studies suggest that around 3-5% of estate and trust administrations involve some form of misappropriation, though this figure can be higher depending on the size of the estate and the complexity of the trust. While outright theft is rare, breaches of fiduciary duty – such as self-dealing, excessive fees, or mismanagement of assets – are more common. Steve Bliss often emphasizes that the vast majority of trustees are honorable individuals, but even a single instance of misconduct can devastate a family and erode the trust’s purpose. He stresses that proactive vetting, like background checks, isn’t about assuming bad intent, but about mitigating potential risks. It’s a key component of a comprehensive estate plan designed to protect assets and ensure the beneficiaries’ needs are met.
What kind of background checks should I conduct?
The scope of background checks for trustees should align with the level of risk and the nature of the trust assets. A basic check might include a criminal history search, a credit report, and verification of any professional licenses or certifications. For trustees handling significant financial assets, a more thorough investigation might include a civil litigation search, a bankruptcy check, and a review of their financial history. Steve Bliss recommends tailoring the checks to the specific circumstances of each trust. For instance, if a trustee will be responsible for managing real estate, a property ownership search might be beneficial. It’s crucial to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) if obtaining credit reports or conducting checks that could affect an individual’s creditworthiness. This means obtaining proper consent and providing the individual with a copy of the report and an opportunity to dispute any inaccuracies.
Can I require a background check in the trust document itself?
Absolutely. The trust document is the primary place to specify the requirements for trustee selection, including the need for a background check. This provides clear guidance and legal authority for conducting the checks. Steve Bliss routinely includes clauses in his trust documents stipulating that potential trustees must consent to a background check as a condition of serving. The clause should outline the scope of the check, who will conduct it, and how the information will be used. It’s also wise to include a provision allowing the trustee to be removed if unfavorable information is revealed during the check. This creates a proactive and legally sound framework for protecting the trust assets. It is also important to establish a clear protocol to assure privacy and confidentiality is maintained during the background check process.
What happens if a background check reveals something concerning?
If a background check reveals concerning information, such as a criminal record or a history of financial mismanagement, it’s crucial to proceed cautiously. Steve Bliss advises clients to seek legal counsel to evaluate the findings and determine the appropriate course of action. Simply disqualifying a potential trustee may not be sufficient; it’s important to understand the nature of the issue, its relevance to the trustee’s duties, and any potential legal implications. In some cases, it may be possible to address the concerns through additional safeguards, such as requiring a co-trustee or implementing stricter accounting procedures. However, if the concerns are serious enough to raise doubts about the trustee’s integrity or competence, it’s generally best to select an alternative trustee.
I once advised a client, Margaret, who insisted on naming her son, David, as trustee despite his well-known gambling addiction.
She was convinced he’d “turn over a new leaf” and see the responsibility as a chance for redemption. I cautioned her repeatedly, explaining the potential risks, but she was adamant. Sadly, my fears were realized. Within months of taking control of the trust, David had depleted a significant portion of the assets, using the funds to fuel his addiction. The ensuing legal battle was devastating for the entire family, leaving them with significantly fewer resources and a deep sense of betrayal. It was a painful lesson in the importance of objective judgment, even when dealing with loved ones. Margaret’s story is a frequent reminder for Steve Bliss to communicate the importance of selecting responsible trustees, irrespective of familial bonds.
Another client, Mr. Henderson, was extremely cautious. He named his daughter as trustee but stipulated in the trust document that she undergo a thorough background check before assuming the role.
The check revealed a minor civil judgment from years prior, related to a business dispute. It wasn’t a major issue, but it prompted a discussion between Mr. Henderson, his daughter, and myself. She explained the circumstances of the judgment, and we were able to establish that it wouldn’t compromise her ability to manage the trust responsibly. However, it did lead to the addition of a co-trustee – a professional financial advisor – to provide oversight and ensure sound financial management. The process reassured Mr. Henderson and strengthened the trust between him and his daughter. This situation is an excellent example of how proactive vetting, combined with open communication and appropriate safeguards, can mitigate risks and foster a successful trust administration. Steve Bliss often shares this case to illustrate the importance of having checks and balances in place.
Are there legal limitations to conducting background checks on trustees?
Yes, there are legal limitations to consider. As mentioned earlier, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) applies if obtaining credit reports or conducting checks that could affect an individual’s creditworthiness. This requires obtaining proper consent, providing a copy of the report, and allowing the individual to dispute any inaccuracies. State laws may also impose restrictions on the types of information that can be obtained or how it can be used. It’s important to consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with all applicable laws. Additionally, discrimination laws may prohibit conducting background checks in a manner that disproportionately impacts certain protected groups. Steve Bliss stresses that transparency and fairness are essential throughout the process.
How can I balance the need for trustee vetting with maintaining family harmony?
Balancing the need for trustee vetting with maintaining family harmony can be challenging. It’s important to approach the process with sensitivity and transparency. Explain to potential trustees why background checks are being conducted and emphasize that it’s not a sign of distrust, but rather a responsible step to protect the trust assets and ensure the beneficiaries’ well-being. Consider involving the potential trustee in the process and allowing them to review the results. If concerns arise, address them openly and honestly. In some cases, it may be possible to address concerns through additional safeguards, such as requiring a co-trustee or implementing stricter accounting procedures. The goal is to find a balance between protecting the trust and preserving family relationships. Steve Bliss always advocates for open communication and a collaborative approach.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
- wills attorney
- wills lawyer
- estate planning attorney
- estate planning lawyer
- probate attorney
- probate lawyer
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “Can I set conditions on how beneficiaries receive money?” or “What are the fiduciary duties of an executor?” and even “What is a small estate affidavit?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Probate or my trust law practice.